대전시의회 행자위, 시민안전실 업무보고.행정사무감사 실시

김정환 기자 | 기사입력 2023/11/09 [17:46]

대전시의회 행자위, 시민안전실 업무보고.행정사무감사 실시

김정환 기자 | 입력 : 2023/11/09 [17:46]

▲ 대전시의회 행정자치위원회  © 대전시의회


대전시의회 행정자치위원회가 9일, 제274회 제2차 정례회를 맞아 제2차 회의를 개회하고, 시민안전실 소관 주요업무보고를 청취하고, 2023년도 행정사무감사를 실시했다.

 

질의에 나선 정명국 부위원장(국민의힘, 동구3)은 “스마트 선별 관제시스템 입찰 과정에 대전시 지역업체가 참여가 배제되었다는 내용이 있는데 지역에는 할 수 있는 업체가 었었나”라며 질의했고, 양승찬 시민안전실장은 “알아본 결과 물품이 있는 업체가 대전에는 없었고 합당한 절차에 따라 조달청을 통해 3자 단가 계약을 체결했다”라고 답변했다. 

 

이에 정 부위원장은 “3자 단가 계약은 결국 수의계약과 같은데 시장께서도 지난 2월 지역경제 선순환 구조를 갖추려면 지역업체가 우선되어야 한다고 언급한 바 있다, 13억 원 장비의 유지보수 비용만 해도 적지 않은데 대전시의 지역업체 선정에 대한 의지가 부족했던 것 아닌가”라며 지적했고, 양 실장은 “사전에 조달청과 충분한 상의를 거쳤고 우수조달인증 물품은 3자 단가 계약을 우선하여 부득이 진행했으며 지역업체가 선정되지 않은 점은 안타깝게 생각한다”라고 답변했다.

 

김진오 위원(국민의힘, 서구1)은 침수 방지시설 설치와 관련, “대전시 관심 덕분에 설치가 잘 진행된 것 같은데 실장님께서는 실제 설치된 물막이판을 보셨나, 보셨다면 어떤 생각을 하셨나”라며 질의했고, 양 실장은 “공동주택 지하 차고에 물이 차는 건 확실히 효과가 있겠다 생각했지만 반지하 주택은 호불호가 있어 설치에 신중한 검토가 필요할 것 같았다”라며, “지형 구조에 따라 조건이 천차만별이라 설치가 쉽지 않아 보였다”라고 덧붙였다. 

 

김 위원은 “실제 설치한 곳을 방문했는데 빗물 등 유입을 막기에는 높이가 너무 낮았고 튼튼해 보이지 않았다, 과연 실제 상황에 효과가 있을지 의문”이라며, “서울은 자체적인 용역을 거쳐 특성을 반영해 사업을 진행한 걸로 아는데 대전시는 그렇지 못했나”라고 질의했다. 양 실장은 “행정안전부의 전국 가이드라인을 바탕으로 규격에 맞게 제작했으나 자체 검토는 없었다, 추후 대전시 특성을 반영해 사업을 준비하겠다”라고 답변했다..

 

조원휘 위원(더불어민주당, 유성구3)은 “1987년부터 2013년까지 21회에 걸쳐 대전시에 ‘사용후핵연료’를 보관·저장하고 있던 사실을 2016년에 처음 국정감사를 통해 수면 위에 드러났다”라며, “원자력 관련 업무가 중앙 정부 소관이지만 우리 시에 연료를 저장 중인 만큼 이를 가볍게 여겨서는 안될 것”이라고 지적했다. 

 

이용기 위원(국민의힘, 대덕구3)은 지역안전지수 등급과 관련하여 “교통사고, 화재, 범죄 등 6개 분야 등급 평가가 대부분 하락했는데 원인이 무엇인가”라며 질의했고, 양승찬 시민안전실장은 “대전시 인구 1만 명당 사망자 수가 높고 도시 노후화, 재난 약자 증가 등 요인으로 지표 산정이 불리하게 작용했다”라고 답변했다. 

 

이 위원은 “작년에도 관련 질의가 있었는데 어떤 대책이 있나”라며 질의했고, 양 실장은 “분야별 등급을 높이기 위한 다양한 검토·연구를 진행 중이며 대전세종연구원 도시안전연구센터 협의를 통해 분야별 방안을 찾는 중”이라며, “담당 팀을 만들어 원인을 상세하게 분석 중이며 다만, 올해 통계는 개선되고 있어 자살 분야 순위가 1위에서 6위로 낮아졌고 지수 개선을 위한 맞춤형 작업을 진행 중”이라고 답변했다. 

 

*아래는 위 기사를 '구글 번역'으로 번역한 영문 기사의 [전문]입니다. '구글번역'은 이해도를 높이기를 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 영문 번역에 오류가 있을 수 있음을 전제로 합니다.<*The following is [the full text] of the English article translated by 'Google Translate'. 'Google Translate' is working hard to improve understanding. It is assumed that there may be errors in the English translation.>

 

Daejeon City Council Executive Committee, Citizen Safety Office work report and administrative audit conducted

 

On the 9th, the Daejeon City Council Administrative Autonomy Committee held the 2nd meeting on the occasion of the 274th 2nd regular meeting, listened to reports on major tasks under the jurisdiction of the Citizen Safety Office, and conducted an administrative affairs audit for 2023.

 

Vice Chairman Jeong Myeong-guk (People Power Party, Dong-gu 3), who asked questions, asked, “There is a statement that local companies in Daejeon were excluded from participation in the smart selection control system bidding process. Were they local companies that could do it?” Citizen Seung-chan Yang asked. The head of the safety department responded, “As a result of our investigation, there was no company in Daejeon that had the goods, and we concluded a third-party unit price contract through the Public Procurement Service following proper procedures.”

 

In response, Vice Chairman Jeong said, “A three-party unit price contract is ultimately the same as a private contract, but the mayor also mentioned in February that local companies should be given priority in order to establish a virtuous cycle of the local economy. The maintenance cost of the 1.3 billion won equipment alone is not small. He pointed out, "Isn't there a lack of will in Daejeon City to select a local company?" and Director Yang said, "We had sufficient consultation with the Public Procurement Service in advance, and for products certified as excellent procurement, third-party unit price contracts were inevitably given priority, and a local company was not selected. “I think it’s a pity that it wasn’t done,” he replied.

 

Regarding the installation of flood prevention facilities, Commissioner Kim Jin-oh (People Power Party, Seo-gu 1) asked, “I think the installation went well thanks to the interest of Daejeon City, but did you see the actual installed water barrier, and if so, what did you think?” Director Yang He said, “I thought it would definitely be effective to fill the underground garage of an apartment complex with water, but there are likes and dislikes for semi-basement houses, so I thought careful consideration would be needed for installation.” He added, “It didn’t seem easy to install because the conditions vary greatly depending on the terrain.” added.

 

Commissioner Kim said, “I visited the place where it was actually installed, but the height was too low to prevent the inflow of rainwater, etc. and it did not look sturdy. I wonder if it will be effective in the actual situation.” He added, “Seoul carried out the project by reflecting its characteristics through its own service. “I know it was carried out, but wasn’t Daejeon City like that?” he asked. Director Yang responded, “We produced it to meet specifications based on the national guidelines of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, but there was no internal review. We will prepare the project in the future by reflecting the characteristics of Daejeon City.”

 

Commissioner Cho Won-hwi (Democratic Party of Korea, Yuseong-gu 3) said, “The fact that ‘spent nuclear fuel’ was stored in Daejeon City on 21 occasions from 1987 to 2013 was first revealed through a government audit in 2016.” He pointed out, “Nuclear energy-related work is under the jurisdiction of the central government, but since fuel is stored in our city, this should not be taken lightly.”

 

Commissioner Lee Yong-gi (People Power Party, Daedeok-gu 3) asked a question regarding the regional safety index rating, saying, “The ratings in six areas, including traffic accidents, fire, and crime, have decreased in most cases. What is the cause?” Yang Seung-chan, head of the Citizen Safety Department, asked. He answered, “The index calculation was unfavorable due to factors such as the high number of deaths per 10,000 people in Daejeon, the aging city, and the increase in disaster victims.”

 

Committee member Lee asked, “There was a related question last year as well. What measures are in place?” Director Yang said, “We are conducting various reviews and research to raise the grade in each field, and are looking for solutions for each field through consultation with the Daejeon Sejong Research Institute’s Urban Safety Research Center.” “He responded, “We have created a team in charge and are analyzing the cause in detail. However, this year’s statistics are improving, so the ranking in the field of suicide has been lowered from 1st to 6th, and customized work is in progress to improve the index.”

 
대전시의회 관련기사목록
더보기
광고
광고
광고